Do we need to list characters in both "Characters" (here) and in i.e. "Primary Characters"? I think it's too much a work to keep that up. It's better that we keep this category clean, besides the sub-categories. We should also add a category called "Guest Characters" for those characters that only have one or two appearences. What do you think? Peter R 20:02, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I agree. Also, a minor point: I do not see any reason why the "C" in "Primary Characters" and "Secondary Characters" should be capitalized. They are not titles nor proper nouns. --Gherald 09:01, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)
I have no idea. It wasn't me who created it, and I'm not native in english, so I leave the expertize to y'all. Peter R 13:00, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I originally made the category 'Characters' to simply list all the characters, but there are obviously a lot, so I made sub categories to divide them (Primary and Secondary). The function for the 'Characters' category then becomes a master list of all characters who are not dividedMikean23 06:18, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

OK, then you agree that we shouldn't list all characters twice, i.e. in primary characters and in characters. Good. Then we should fix the current wrongs on that account. :) Peter R 19:43, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.